Lincoln, Ne - Lawmakers gave first-round approval Feb. 11 to a bill intended to increase Medicaid provider reimbursement rates without the use of general fund dollars. Modeled on a proposal approved by lawmakers last year to levy an assessment on all Nebraska hospitals, LB527, introduced by North Platte Sen. Mike Jacobson, would use a similar mechanism to levy an assessment on the state’s health maintenance organizations.

Under the bill, the state Department of Health and Human Services would be required to submit a state plan amendment to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services by Aug. 1, 2025.

If approved, the state plan amendment would authorize collection of a 6% tax on all non-Medicare premiums written in Nebraska under an HMO certificate of authority, to be collected by the state Department of Insurance.

Revenue generated by the tax would be remitted to a newly created Medicaid Access and Quality Fund. DHHS would use the fund to leverage federal matching dollars to enhance Medicaid reimbursement rates paid to nonhospital providers of physical health services, with an emphasis on evaluation and management, labor and delivery and rural health services.

The fund also would be used to pay a monthly per-member fee of at least $75 to qualified primary care providers who meet criteria to serve as a primary care medical home for target populations. Any remaining funds would be used within the state’s Medicaid and CHIP programs.

Jacobson said the bill, when combined with federal matching funds, would generate approximately $115 million to enhance rates for providers. Those enhanced rates would help increase access to health care services, he said, noting that more than half of Nebraska counties currently are defined as maternity care deserts.

“This bill is incredibly important to the future of health care in our state, especially in rural areas and especially for pregnant women and Nebraska children,” Jacobson said.

Following adoption of a technical amendment from the Banking, Commerce and Insurance Committee, senators voted 39-0 to advance LB527 from general file.

Lincoln, Ne - Lawmakers gave first-round approval Feb. 11 to a bill intended to increase Medicaid provider reimbursement rates without the use of general fund dollars. Modeled on a proposal approved by lawmakers last year to levy an assessment on all Nebraska hospitals, LB527, introduced by North Platte Sen. Mike Jacobson, would use a similar mechanism to levy an assessment on the state’s health maintenance organizations.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/2/1739378841299.jpeg" alt="Mike Jacobsen - Nebraska Senator-District 42" />
 <figcaption>Mike Jacobsen - Nebraska Senator-District 42</figcaption>
 </figure>Under the bill, the state Department of Health and Human Services would be required to submit a state plan amendment to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services by Aug. 1, 2025.If approved, the state plan amendment would authorize collection of a 6% tax on all non-Medicare premiums written in Nebraska under an HMO certificate of authority, to be collected by the state Department of Insurance.Revenue generated by the tax would be remitted to a newly created Medicaid Access and Quality Fund. DHHS would use the fund to leverage federal matching dollars to enhance Medicaid reimbursement rates paid to nonhospital providers of physical health services, with an emphasis on evaluation and management, labor and delivery and rural health services.The fund also would be used to pay a monthly per-member fee of at least $75 to qualified primary care providers who meet criteria to serve as a primary care medical home for target populations. Any remaining funds would be used within the state’s Medicaid and CHIP programs.Jacobson said the bill, when combined with federal matching funds, would generate approximately $115 million to enhance rates for providers. Those enhanced rates would help increase access to health care services, he said, noting that more than half of Nebraska counties currently are defined as maternity care deserts.“This bill is incredibly important to the future of health care in our state, especially in rural areas and especially for pregnant women and Nebraska children,” Jacobson said.Following adoption of a technical amendment from the Banking, Commerce and Insurance Committee, senators voted 39-0 to advance LB527 from general file.

NE Lawmakers give First-Round Yes to Bill to Increase Medicaid Reimbursement Rates without General Fund Dollars

WASHINGTON —On Tuesday, President Donald Trump and his Special Envoy Steve Witkoff announced that Witkoff left Russian airspace with Marc Fogel, an American who was detained by Russia since 2021, according to a statement from the White House.

President Trump, Witkoff and the President's advisors negotiated an exchange that serves as a show of good faith from Russia and a sign we are moving in the right direction to end the burtal and terrible war in Ukraine.

"Since President Trump's swearing-in, he has successfully secured the released of Americans around the world and he will continue until all Americans being held are returned to the United States."

Marc Fogel is expected to be back on American soil and reunited with family and loved ones tonight, according to the release.

WASHINGTON —On Tuesday, President Donald Trump and his Special Envoy Steve Witkoff announced that Witkoff left Russian airspace with Marc Fogel, an American who was detained by Russia since 2021, according to a statement from the White House.<div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">WELCOME HOME, MARC!🇺🇸 <a href="https://t.co/0b2Igcqudp">pic.twitter.com/0b2Igcqudp</a>&mdash; Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1889529852757201368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 12, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">WELCOME HOME, MARC!🇺🇸 <a href="https://t.co/0b2Igcqudp">pic.twitter.com/0b2Igcqudp</a>&mdash; Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1889529852757201368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 12, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">MARC FOGEL IS BACK!!! 🇺🇸 PROMISES MADE, PROMISES KEPT!!! 🇺🇸 <a href="https://t.co/ZMceoU0OfA">pic.twitter.com/ZMceoU0OfA</a>&mdash; The White House (@WhiteHouse) <a href="https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1889505612792258637?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 12, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/2/1739304767115.png" alt="Marc Fogel on the flight home from Russia on Tuesday-photo by Adam Boehler, United States Envoy for Hostages. " />
 <figcaption>Marc Fogel on the flight home from Russia on Tuesday-photo by Adam Boehler, United States Envoy for Hostages. </figcaption>
 </figure>President Trump, Witkoff and the President's advisors negotiated an exchange that serves as a show of good faith from Russia and a sign we are moving in the right direction to end the burtal and terrible war in Ukraine."Since President Trump's swearing-in, he has successfully secured the released of Americans around the world and he will continue until all Americans being held are returned to the United States."Marc Fogel is expected to be back on American soil and reunited with family and loved ones tonight, according to the release.

White House: American teacher freed from Russian prison is home

<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/02/10/nebraska-lawmakers-hear-support-for-opening-unemployment-insurance-to-immigrant-dreamers/">Nebraska Examiner</a>

LINCOLN — Nebraska lawmakers are considering a legislative proposal that would put the state in sync with nearly all, if not all, other states in allowing access to unemployment insurance benefits to immigrants who have permission to work in the U.S. but who lack permanent residency.

The state’s current prohibition on the benefits applies to certain authorized immigrant workers despite the fact their employers pay unemployment insurance taxes on their behalf.

So-called “Dreamers,” who grew up in the U.S. after being brought here illegally as minors by their parents, are a primary population excluded from such benefits.

Nebraska Dreamers, legally in the U.S. as recipients of the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, were among the 10 people in the majority that testified Monday in support of&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Intro/LB299.pdf" target="_blank">Legislative Bill 299</a>&nbsp;at the Nebraska Capitol.

LB 299, the topic of a public hearing before the Legislature’s Business and Labor Committee, has bipartisan sponsorship. It was introduced by State Sen. Teresa Ibach of Sumner, a Republican, and by State Sen. Margo Juarez of Omaha, a Democrat.

We’re talking about Nebraska’s workforce shortage, and these individuals have been essential to filling in that workforce shortage and are in compliance with the federal laws.

– State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln

Zayra Navarrete, who has had DACA status since 2013 and works as a financial advisor in Hastings, told the committee she contributes to a pension, life insurance and unemployment benefits. She said she lives in fear that if unforeseen circumstances led to a job loss, she would not have the same lifeline as co-workers.

“I am constantly preparing alternatives for an emergency crisis,” Navarrete said, figuring out backup strategies that include taking out loans or selling personal assets.

She said the question of unemployment benefits for workers in her situation came to the forefront during COVID-19 — when some workers who were laid-off were not provided the same help to get by during the crescendo of the pandemic.

Said Navarrete: “Why is a state that is benefiting over $14 million in state and local taxes from DACA recipients not allowing us to access those funds?”

The National Immigration Law Center did not have a current comprehensive inventory of states with policies akin to LB 299. But Tanya Broder, senior counsel, said that most, if not all states, offer unemployment insurance benefits to immigrants in similar situations.

Nick Grandgenett, an attorney with Nebraska Appleseed, said the proposed legislation would benefit DACA recipients as well as asylum-seekers who have been granted work authorization while their requests are reviewed and others with Temporary Protected Status that is granted when returning to a person’s home country is unsafe due to natural disaster, extraordinary conditions or war.

The only person to testify in opposition to LB 299 on Monday was interim Labor Commissioner Katie Thurber, who noted that the measure essentially creates a new state definition for “eligible alien.”

She said that more than $400 million in tax credits is at stake.

For Nebraska to receive federal funds to help administer its unemployment program, the state must meet certain federal conformity requirements, Thurber said.

She said Nebraska has been given an advanced warning by the U.S. Department of Labor that, as drafted, LB 299 likely creates a conformity issue. She said her understanding is that the language is too broad, allowing benefits even if the immigrant lost legal authorization to work in the U.S.

Maintaining conformity under LB 299, she said, “becomes particularly concerning” given the uncertain future of DACA, depending on the results of an ongoing court battle.

Thurber’s objections prompted a firm challenge from committee member State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln.

“You know, Nebraska does have a conformity issue — a nonconformity issue,” Raybould said. “We were the very last state in the entire United States to allow our DACA qualified people to have a driver’s license. … We were the last state in the entire union to recognize the degrees they have achieved through their hard work at our own universities.”

Raybould said it is her understanding that Nebraska is the only state that does not allow DACA and certain other authorized immigrant workers access to unemployment benefits that their employers contribute to.

Thurber said she was not saying there aren’t “ways around” the nonconformity language, and noted that the Labor Department worked with State Sen. Mike McDonnell of Omaha on similar 2021 legislation that was never enacted.

She said, however, that as currently drafted, LB 299 could cost Nebraska employers more than $400 million in federal tax credits unless conformity questions are resolved.

Backing the proposed legislation Monday were groups such as the&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/09/18/more-than-60-ne-entities-show-unified-front-to-update-laws-state-policies-that-help-immigrants/">Nebraska Alliance for Thriving Communities</a>&nbsp;and business organizations including the Nebraska Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Omaha and Lincoln Chambers of Commerce.

“We’re talking about Nebraska’s workforce shortage, and these individuals have been essential to filling in that workforce shortage and are in compliance with the federal laws,” said Raybould. “I find it really hard to believe that we in the state of Nebraska can not get it right like all the other 49 states have done to make sure we are in conformity … What are we doing wrong?”

Thurber, at the end of the back-and-forth, said she has offered assistance to Ibach to address the conformity issue.

State Sen. Kathleen Kauth, chair of the Business and Labor Committee, said 46 people wrote in support of the proposed legislation and eight were opposed.

The committee took no action on whether to advance the bill to debate by the full Legislature.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/2/1739297179070.jpeg" alt="The Nebraska Alliance for Thriving Communities, a coalition of labor unions, hospitals, banks, cattlemen and pork producers gather in September at the Capitol to proclaim that certain immigration policies and laws should be updated, partly to help address Nebraska’s workforce shortage. The alliance supported Legislative Bill 299, which was the topic of a public hearing Monday. (Cindy Gonzalez/Nebraska Examiner)" />
 <figcaption>The Nebraska Alliance for Thriving Communities, a coalition of labor unions, hospitals, banks, cattlemen and pork producers gather in September at the Capitol to proclaim that certain immigration policies and laws should be updated, partly to help address Nebraska’s workforce shortage. The alliance supported Legislative Bill 299, which was the topic of a public hearing Monday. (Cindy Gonzalez/Nebraska Examiner)</figcaption>
 </figure>Cindy Gonzalez<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/02/10/nebraska-lawmakers-hear-support-for-opening-unemployment-insurance-to-immigrant-dreamers/">Nebraska Examiner</a>LINCOLN — Nebraska lawmakers are considering a legislative proposal that would put the state in sync with nearly all, if not all, other states in allowing access to unemployment insurance benefits to immigrants who have permission to work in the U.S. but who lack permanent residency.The state’s current prohibition on the benefits applies to certain authorized immigrant workers despite the fact their employers pay unemployment insurance taxes on their behalf.So-called “Dreamers,” who grew up in the U.S. after being brought here illegally as minors by their parents, are a primary population excluded from such benefits.Nebraska Dreamers, legally in the U.S. as recipients of the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, were among the 10 people in the majority that testified Monday in support of&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/109/PDF/Intro/LB299.pdf" target="_blank">Legislative Bill 299</a>&nbsp;at the Nebraska Capitol.<h2>Bipartisan support</h2>LB 299, the topic of a public hearing before the Legislature’s Business and Labor Committee, has bipartisan sponsorship. It was introduced by State Sen. Teresa Ibach of Sumner, a Republican, and by State Sen. Margo Juarez of Omaha, a Democrat.We’re talking about Nebraska’s workforce shortage, and these individuals have been essential to filling in that workforce shortage and are in compliance with the federal laws.– State Sen. Jane Raybould of LincolnZayra Navarrete, who has had DACA status since 2013 and works as a financial advisor in Hastings, told the committee she contributes to a pension, life insurance and unemployment benefits. She said she lives in fear that if unforeseen circumstances led to a job loss, she would not have the same lifeline as co-workers.“I am constantly preparing alternatives for an emergency crisis,” Navarrete said, figuring out backup strategies that include taking out loans or selling personal assets.She said the question of unemployment benefits for workers in her situation came to the forefront during COVID-19 — when some workers who were laid-off were not provided the same help to get by during the crescendo of the pandemic.Said Navarrete: “Why is a state that is benefiting over $14 million in state and local taxes from DACA recipients not allowing us to access those funds?”The National Immigration Law Center did not have a current comprehensive inventory of states with policies akin to LB 299. But Tanya Broder, senior counsel, said that most, if not all states, offer unemployment insurance benefits to immigrants in similar situations.Nick Grandgenett, an attorney with Nebraska Appleseed, said the proposed legislation would benefit DACA recipients as well as asylum-seekers who have been granted work authorization while their requests are reviewed and others with Temporary Protected Status that is granted when returning to a person’s home country is unsafe due to natural disaster, extraordinary conditions or war.<h2>Labor Department objects</h2>The only person to testify in opposition to LB 299 on Monday was interim Labor Commissioner Katie Thurber, who noted that the measure essentially creates a new state definition for “eligible alien.”She said that more than $400 million in tax credits is at stake.For Nebraska to receive federal funds to help administer its unemployment program, the state must meet certain federal conformity requirements, Thurber said.She said Nebraska has been given an advanced warning by the U.S. Department of Labor that, as drafted, LB 299 likely creates a conformity issue. She said her understanding is that the language is too broad, allowing benefits even if the immigrant lost legal authorization to work in the U.S.Maintaining conformity under LB 299, she said, “becomes particularly concerning” given the uncertain future of DACA, depending on the results of an ongoing court battle.Thurber’s objections prompted a firm challenge from committee member State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln.“You know, Nebraska does have a conformity issue — a nonconformity issue,” Raybould said. “We were the very last state in the entire United States to allow our DACA qualified people to have a driver’s license. … We were the last state in the entire union to recognize the degrees they have achieved through their hard work at our own universities.”Raybould said it is her understanding that Nebraska is the only state that does not allow DACA and certain other authorized immigrant workers access to unemployment benefits that their employers contribute to.Thurber said she was not saying there aren’t “ways around” the nonconformity language, and noted that the Labor Department worked with State Sen. Mike McDonnell of Omaha on similar 2021 legislation that was never enacted.She said, however, that as currently drafted, LB 299 could cost Nebraska employers more than $400 million in federal tax credits unless conformity questions are resolved.<h2>Business support</h2>Backing the proposed legislation Monday were groups such as the&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/09/18/more-than-60-ne-entities-show-unified-front-to-update-laws-state-policies-that-help-immigrants/">Nebraska Alliance for Thriving Communities</a>&nbsp;and business organizations including the Nebraska Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Omaha and Lincoln Chambers of Commerce.“We’re talking about Nebraska’s workforce shortage, and these individuals have been essential to filling in that workforce shortage and are in compliance with the federal laws,” said Raybould. “I find it really hard to believe that we in the state of Nebraska can not get it right like all the other 49 states have done to make sure we are in conformity … What are we doing wrong?”Thurber, at the end of the back-and-forth, said she has offered assistance to Ibach to address the conformity issue.State Sen. Kathleen Kauth, chair of the Business and Labor Committee, said 46 people wrote in support of the proposed legislation and eight were opposed.The committee took no action on whether to advance the bill to debate by the full Legislature.

Nebraska Lawmakers Hear Support for Opening Unemployment Insurance to Immigrant ‘Dreamers’

<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/02/11/face-to-face-nsea-president-school-choice-laws-author-debate-future-of-nebraska-education/">Nebraska Examiner</a>

LINCOLN —&nbsp;Months after a tense election cycle to repeal the state’s two latest school choice laws, the former state senator who wrote those bills and the current president of the state teacher’s union spent Saturday debating the future of education policy, with a focus on Nebraska students in need.

Lou Ann Linehan, the former state senator for the Elkhorn area, and Tim Royers, president of the Nebraska State Education Association, sat side by side for the&nbsp;<a href="https://nelegisbrief.org/" target="_blank">50th annual Nebraska Ecumenical Legislative Briefing Day</a>&nbsp;at Christ United Methodist Church in Lincoln.

They debated school choice and more for about an hour, offering competing visions for what the next steps should be to change the “status quo.”

The pair have crossed paths in and out of the Legislature, often clashing in recent years in Linehan’s two committees: Revenue and Education. Royers was past president of the Millard Education Association, and Linehan chaired the Revenue Committee for six years.

Beyond policy disagreements, the two have found common ground in Linehan-led and teacher-backed efforts to increase support for students struggling with reading, including dyslexia, which Linehan has, and to increase state funding for schools, largely to offset the amount of school spending relying on property taxes.

Linehan also assisted Royers, a civics and government teacher for Millard before ascending to the top NSEA post last fall, by personally replying in writing to students or otherwise engaging with them on assignments and presentations that Royers devised.

Most recently, Linehan and Royers were among the public faces of Nebraska’s school choice “battle,” as Linehan described it Saturday, hosting&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2023/04/29/not-in-nebraska-public-school-advocates-rally-against-opportunity-scholarship-bill/">dueling</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/10/29/lawmakers-public-school-advocates-spar-over-ads-against-using-state-funds-for-ne-private-schools/">rallies</a>&nbsp;for and against Linehan’s past laws.

It was a fight that sometimes got personal, including Linehan questioning whether the union had the best interests of children or families at heart and the union pointing out Linehan’s familial connection to the American Federation for Children. Her daughter works for the group.

Linehan, who was term-limited last month after eight years, led the passage of two laws in her final two years to help Nebraska families cover the costs of attending a private K-12 school, after multiple earlier attempts.

“I’ve always been able to choose and pick [what was best for my children] because I had the financial ability and the knowledge to do so, and I don’t think that choice should be limited to just those with means,” Linehan said Saturday.

NSEA-backed Support Our Schools and Linehan-backed Keep Kids First raised and spent more than $9 million combined, for and against the referendum measures in 2023 and 2024. Support Our Schools accounted for 83% of that total fundraising and spending. A key reason for the imbalance: Linehan and her supporters largely declined to fight the 2024 referendum.

Royers said&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/07/lawmakers-probe-special-education-option-enrollment-among-nebraska-school-districts/">option enrollment</a>, which allows parents to apply and possibly move their child to a different district or school than the one they live closest to, gives parents a choice in public schools, which Linehan supports.&nbsp;

However, she has criticized option enrollment for leaving some students behind, particularly those receiving special education or those who can’t afford transportation to a different school or district.

If there’s an issue with a neighborhood school, those should be resolved first, Royers said. He said he and Linehan have a “philosophical disagreement” on how best to meet the needs of Nebraska students.

“All of those kids deserve to have the education they should need,” Royers said. “It shouldn’t just be that we provide a lifeboat to a handful of kids to go somewhere else.”

The annual Ecumenical Briefing Day focuses on the assumption that part of living under God’s grace means “fighting for justice for those oppressed or in need whose voices go unheard.”

Linehan and Royers also weighed in on how to best support underperforming schools, what possible ramifications could come of federal calls to abolish the U.S. Department of Education and whether chaplains should be allowed to serve as school counselors.

Among NSEA’s main concerns that Royers voiced Saturday:

“Does that mean if we removed ‘approved’ and it was just ‘accredited,’ that you would support it?” Linehan asked Royers.

“I would be more comfortable with it, how about that,” he said.

Royers said the laws also come as some attempt to privatize the education system and profit off of it. However, he said, he doesn’t think that is Linehan’s goal.

“Even though I fundamentally disagree with the solution she’s advocating for, I fundamentally do believe that she believes this is in the best interest of kids,” Royers said.

About 57% of voters rejected Linehan’s latest school choice law in November, Legislative Bill 1402, an annual $10 million appropriation to the State Treasurer’s office to distribute funds to families to offset private school attendance costs. It was the fourth time Nebraska voters have rejected school choice proposals at the ballot box.

Her successor, State Sen. Tony Sorrentino, has introduced a bill to revive the 2023 version of Linehan’s school choice law, LB 753, which set aside $25 million in dollar-for-dollar income tax credits to offset private donations to organizations funding scholarships for students seeking to attend private K-12 schools. Linehan repealed the 2023 version in favor of the direct scholarship or voucher program last year.

Sorrentino’s&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59783" target="_blank">Legislative Bill 509</a>&nbsp;is joined by&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskalegislature.gov/bills/view_bill.php?DocumentID=59768" target="_blank">LB 624</a>&nbsp;from State Sen. Rob Dover of Norfolk, which would&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/28/hope-omaha-mother-daughters-call-to-revive-nebraska-school-choice-law/">revive the new scholarship or voucher program</a>&nbsp;that&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/12/medical-cannabis-paid-sick-leave-abortion-restrictions-and-school-choice-repeal-take-effect/">voters repealed in November</a>. Both are among&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/28/nebraska-school-choice-supporters-opponents-ready-for-another-rematch/">at least seven school choice bills</a>&nbsp;in the 2025 legislative session.

Much of the union’s hesitation and pushback has less to do with what the proposal is now, Royers said, and more to do with what it could become and “the door that could open.” He said that concern grows with Linehan no longer in the Legislature because he understands Linehan’s intent with her legislation. Similar laws in other states have started at a similar scale, scope and focus and have grown, he explained.&nbsp;

I’ve always been able to choose and pick (what was best for my children) because I had the financial ability and the knowledge to do so, and I don’t think that choice should be limited to just those with means.

– Former State Sen. Lou Ann Linehan

Linehan said that if students are leaving any school in droves, it should raise questions.&nbsp;<a href="http://v/" target="_blank">Some families can’t afford to leave</a>&nbsp;and might not feel like they have the power to demand change, she said, pointing to parts of the Omaha Public Schools, where she said some schools have underperformed “for two or three generations.”

“If you are poor and you are afraid somebody might come and take your kids away from you, you don’t go to school and demand answers,” Linehan said.

Asked by an audience member about the next steps for underperforming schools, Royers agreed with Linehan that many decisions reside in the Nebraska Department of Education.

Linehan said it is up to the department and the State Board of Education to accredit schools, but she said it’s right to question why schools that are failing are still being accredited or receiving more state aid per-student aid than others that are performing better.

“It’s not always just money,” Linehan said of solutions.

Royers said he needs to do better in voicing alternatives to Linehan’s approach, which he said Saturday is the “<a href="https://www.nea.org/student-success/great-public-schools/community-schools/what-are-they" target="_blank">community school model</a>.” It seeks to tailor services and supports specifically for each neighborhood, decentralizing decision-making and bringing in parents with a voting voice to “help steer the school in the right direction to meet the needs of their kids.”

“It’s not a cookie cutter answer, because the fundamental principle is it should be tailored to whatever the needs of the community are,” Royers said.

All of those kids deserve to have the education they should need. It shouldn’t just be that we provide a lifeboat to a handful of kids to go somewhere else.

– Tim Royers, president of the Nebraska State Education Association

Linehan said she is “so proud” of Sorrentino, who she said “just ran in there” and said, “I’m going to do this.” She said it takes a lot of nerve and is very hard to take on the teacher’s union.

“The Education Committee in the Legislature is one of the most important committees there is. And if you’re a Republican, a conservative, and you’re for choice, and you put yourself on that committee, you’re putting a bull’s-eye on your back, and it’s not right,” Linehan said. “We can help all kids, and I’ve always wanted to help all kids.”

Royers said that while the two disagree on how, he and Linehan are united in wanting to help students.

“Where I think we do have common ground is both of us are unhappy with the status quo,” Royers said. “We just fundamentally disagree on what the solution is to the status quo.”

Both Royers and Linehan bristled at the suggestion of having chaplains serve as school counselors, a proposal advanced by State Sen. Loren Lippincott of Central City in 2024 and proposed again in LB 549 in 2025. The new bill would allow a clergy member to serve at a school in a volunteer capacity, such as providing academic, career, emotional or behavioral health support.

Royers said that while he’s had important pastors in his life, they’re not trained to be counselors.&nbsp;

“To imply that those two are the same, candidly, in my mind is insulting to both counselors and religious leaders,” Royers said.

Counselors also take up coordination of federal Section 504 support plans for students, Royers said. It is a second tier of special education services with a lower qualifying threshold than individualized education plans (IEPs).

Linehan said she hasn’t read the new bill, but she remembers part of the 2024 push was for schools without counselors or other needed teachers in rural Nebraska, which could be helpful. She said she didn’t disagree with Royers’ concerns.

“If you’re going to be a counselor, you need education that says you’re a counselor,” Linehan said.

Some of the biggest cheers for both debaters came from an audience question on the possible ramifications to Nebraska schools of President Donald Trump, tech billionaire Elon Musk “and their kind” who have pushed ideas including the abolishment of the U.S. Department of Education.

Royers said if anybody tried to give a definitive answer right now “they’re wrong,” because while there is a lot of rhetoric that sounds alarming, it “really doesn’t have a lot of teeth behind it.” For example, he said, eliminating the federal department would require an act of Congress.&nbsp;

He predicted that once people realize the department’s role as a distributor of resources with little influence on curriculum, abolishing it will face bipartisan opposition, as it did last year. Royers said eliminating the department would diminish certain financial accountability measures in place for federal dollars, such as requiring compliance with federal special education laws.

“Right now, it just feels overwhelming and you have to play almost a sense of policy triage, otherwise you mentally won’t get through these next four years, just to be candid with you,” Royers said. “You have to prioritize what’s the most immediate concern.”

Linehan said she had breakfast Thursday with a very conservative friend who similarly questioned federal actions in recent weeks and called it “crazy.”

“It is crazy, and I agree with Tim,” Linehan said. “The president of the United States can’t just do things. He can’t just fire people. He can’t just do away with departments. He’s got to deal with Congress.”

Linehan worked in Washington, D.C., for 12 years, including as campaign manager and later chief of staff for&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/05/24/nebraska-leads-with-new-veteran-justice-program-aiming-to-steer-veterans-back-to-hero-status/">former U.S. Sen. Chuck Hagel</a>, R-Neb. She later worked in the U.S. Department of State in various roles, including deputy assistant secretary. She said it’s hard to get anything done in Washington.&nbsp;

Linehan said Trump is “showboating a bit” to let people feel like he’ll get something done.&nbsp;

With a flood of information, she also offered her personal solution: “I do not listen to the blah, blah, blah on TV … It’s not healthy.”

Linehan also earned a laugh when she said at one point, “I am never running again, you can tell by some of my answers.”

Royers similarly suggested self-reflection on reactions to political developments, noting that negativity draws more attention. He said more people engaged with the NSEA on social media posts regarding school choice than when the union discussed the&nbsp;<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2025/01/28/nsea-lawmakers-outline-2025-priorities-after-survey-of-nearly-10000-nebraska-teachers/">priorities of its teachers</a>. He said getting engagement on those other issues is “like pulling teeth.”

“We’ve gotten very good at getting fired up about something we don’t like,” Royers said.&nbsp;

He continued: “It’s a choice to always focus on things that get you fired up in the wrong way, and we still need to be vigilant about these things, don’t get me wrong, but at a certain point, we’re just eating ourselves up.”

Most recent ‘school choice’ laws and latest proposals

LB 753 (2023)&nbsp;—&nbsp;The “Opportunity Scholarships Act” from State Sen. Lou Ann Linehan. It created dollar-for-dollar income tax credits for individuals who donated to newly established scholarship granting organizations. The annual cap was $25 million in credits, which could grow to $100 million each year over time, if there was high demand. Passed 33-11 in May 2023. The Support Our Schools campaign gathered enough signatures to place a repeal of the law on the November 2024 ballot, raising and spending more than $1.8 million to do so. The Keep Kids First campaign, backed by Linehan, raised and spent more than $1.4 million against the signature-gathering effort.

LB 1402 (2024)&nbsp;—&nbsp;The second similar school choice law from Linehan. It created an annual $10 million program in the State Treasurer’s Office for $10 million in education scholarships or vouchers. The bill repealed LB 753, ending the active repeal efforts. Passed 32-15 in April 2024. The Support Our Schools campaign gathered enough signatures to place a repeal of the law on the November 2024 ballot, raising and spending more than $5.6 million to do so. The Linehan-backed Keep Kids First campaign raised about $86,000 and spent $127,000 opposing the referendum effort. The repeal passed at the ballot box with about 57% support, receiving majority support in 45 of the state’s 49 legislative districts.

LB 509 (2025) and LB 624 (2025)&nbsp;—&nbsp;LB 509, from State Sen. Tony Sorrentino, Linehan’s successor, would nearly word-for-word revive the Opportunity Scholarships Act. LB 624, from State Sen. Rob Dover, would revive LB 1402 in the State Treasurer’s Office. Other bills in 2025 seek to enact school choice policies, such as through option enrollment (LB 557, State Sen. Christy Armendariz of Omaha; LB 633, State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair), educational savings accounts (LB 131, Sorrentino; LB 427, State Sen. Bob Andersen of Omaha) or limiting such state support for foster care youths (LB 481, State Sen. Beau Ballard of Lincoln).

Face to face: NSEA president, School Choice Laws Author Debate Future of Nebraska Education

February&nbsp; 11, 2025 (Lincoln, NEB.)&nbsp;&nbsp;—&nbsp; Today is Safer Internet Day! The Nebraska State Patrol Tech Crimes Unit and Internet Crimes Against Children Taskforce are urging parents to get engaged in their kids’ online activity.

Safer Internet Day has grown into a worldwide effort since starting in 2004. The program delivers tips for safe practices online, information for teachers and schools, and guides for how to talk with your kids about maintaining safety in the internet age.

“Digital technology is a powerful tool with many benefits, but it’s critical that while our children learn how to use it, they also learn how to stay safe online,” said Lt. Monty Lovelace, Commander of NSP Tech Crimes. “We encourage all parents to have open communication with their kids about online activity and how to use the internet wisely.”

This year’s Safer Internet Day focuses on several important topics:

NSP encourages all internet users to keep safety in mind as they conduct their online activity. Resources are available at the&nbsp;<a href="https://safer.connectsafely.org/" target="_blank">Safer Internet Day</a>&nbsp;website.

Cody ThomasNebraska State PatrolFebruary&nbsp; 11, 2025 (Lincoln, NEB.)&nbsp;&nbsp;—&nbsp; Today is Safer Internet Day! The Nebraska State Patrol Tech Crimes Unit and Internet Crimes Against Children Taskforce are urging parents to get engaged in their kids’ online activity.Safer Internet Day has grown into a worldwide effort since starting in 2004. The program delivers tips for safe practices online, information for teachers and schools, and guides for how to talk with your kids about maintaining safety in the internet age.“Digital technology is a powerful tool with many benefits, but it’s critical that while our children learn how to use it, they also learn how to stay safe online,” said Lt. Monty Lovelace, Commander of NSP Tech Crimes. “We encourage all parents to have open communication with their kids about online activity and how to use the internet wisely.”This year’s Safer Internet Day focuses on several important topics:<ul>
 <li>Generative AI</li><li>Media literacy and critical thinking</li><li>Civility</li><li>Picking on peers</li><li>Wellness, identity, and self-respect</li><li>Scams, predators, and creeps</li>
 </ul>NSP encourages all internet users to keep safety in mind as they conduct their online activity. Resources are available at the&nbsp;<a href="https://safer.connectsafely.org/" target="_blank">Safer Internet Day</a>&nbsp;website.

NSP Urges Online Safety for Safer Internet Day

LINCOLN, NE – Governor Jim Pillen testified before the Nebraska Legislature’s Education Committee in favor of LB303 which aims to provide Nebraskans with additional property tax relief by altering the Tax Equity and Educational Opportunities Support Act (TEEOSA). Senator Jana Hughes introduced LB303 at the Governor’s request.

TEEOSA has been Nebraska’s school funding formula since 1990. Its primary function is to provide state equalization aid to those schools where the needs exceed budget resources. During his testimony, Gov. Pillen pointed out that since 2000, school district taxes have increased from $1 billion to over $3 billion, and in that same time frame, the number of equalized school districts has dropped significantly, from 226 to just 60.

“Nebraska’s students and taxpayers need stability in funding. School districts often live under uncertain budget circumstances. It is difficult to project the amount of dollars that will come from the TEEOSA formula as property tax valuations continue to rise across the state,” said Gov. Pillen. “Providing stability to the TEEOSA formula is necessary and will require constant review and consideration. We must start managing the formula and not allowing the formula to manage us.”

Among the proposed changes to TEEOSA in LB303:

Both Sen. Hughes and Gov. Pillen emphasized that ensuring local control among school districts was paramount to this legislation.

“During the current fiscal year, 111 schools have seen a decrease in state aid. Modeling from the Nebraska Department of Education shows that LB303 will provide just over $62 million more in state aid to schools,” said Sen. Hughes. “While this doesn’t fully compensate for the loss due to rising valuations, it will lessen the impact on property taxpayers next year. Without the increase in funds provided to schools through LB303, the entire loss in state aid to these districts will fall to taxpayers.”

Organizations testifying in favor of LB 303 included the Nebraska State Education Association (NSEA), Greater Nebraska Schools Association (GNSA), Educational Service Units (ESUs), Nebraska Association of School Boards (NASB), Nebraska Council of School Administrators (NCSA), Open Sky Policy Institute, Nebraska Rural Community Schools Association (NRCSA), Schools Taking Action for Nebraska Children's Education (STANCE), Nebraska Farmers Union and the Nebraska Farm Bureau, representing a working group of ag organizations.

Office of Governor Jim PillenLINCOLN, NE – Governor Jim Pillen testified before the Nebraska Legislature’s Education Committee in favor of LB303 which aims to provide Nebraskans with additional property tax relief by altering the Tax Equity and Educational Opportunities Support Act (TEEOSA). Senator Jana Hughes introduced LB303 at the Governor’s request.TEEOSA has been Nebraska’s school funding formula since 1990. Its primary function is to provide state equalization aid to those schools where the needs exceed budget resources. During his testimony, Gov. Pillen pointed out that since 2000, school district taxes have increased from $1 billion to over $3 billion, and in that same time frame, the number of equalized school districts has dropped significantly, from 226 to just 60.“Nebraska’s students and taxpayers need stability in funding. School districts often live under uncertain budget circumstances. It is difficult to project the amount of dollars that will come from the TEEOSA formula as property tax valuations continue to rise across the state,” said Gov. Pillen. “Providing stability to the TEEOSA formula is necessary and will require constant review and consideration. We must start managing the formula and not allowing the formula to manage us.”Among the proposed changes to TEEOSA in LB303:<ul>
 <li>Dropping the maximum levy from $1.05 to $1.02</li><li>Increasing the minimum amount of state aid for each public-school student (Foundation Aid) by 6%, from $1500 to $1590 per student</li><li>Prohibiting school districts with a base levy adjustment of lower than $.30 from receiving state aid</li><li>Creating a commission to review the TEEOSA formula every year and provide feedback to elected officials on potential improvements</li>
 </ul>Both Sen. Hughes and Gov. Pillen emphasized that ensuring local control among school districts was paramount to this legislation.“During the current fiscal year, 111 schools have seen a decrease in state aid. Modeling from the Nebraska Department of Education shows that LB303 will provide just over $62 million more in state aid to schools,” said Sen. Hughes. “While this doesn’t fully compensate for the loss due to rising valuations, it will lessen the impact on property taxpayers next year. Without the increase in funds provided to schools through LB303, the entire loss in state aid to these districts will fall to taxpayers.”Organizations testifying in favor of LB 303 included the Nebraska State Education Association (NSEA), Greater Nebraska Schools Association (GNSA), Educational Service Units (ESUs), Nebraska Association of School Boards (NASB), Nebraska Council of School Administrators (NCSA), Open Sky Policy Institute, Nebraska Rural Community Schools Association (NRCSA), Schools Taking Action for Nebraska Children's Education (STANCE), Nebraska Farmers Union and the Nebraska Farm Bureau, representing a working group of ag organizations.

Gov. Pillen Advocates for Property Tax Relief Through TEEOSA Adjustments

WASHINGTON —Google has officially changed the 'Gulf of Mexico' on Google Maps to the 'Gulf of America' following Trump's order.

While flying to the Super Bowl, President Trump signed a proclamation declaring February 9, as "Gulf of America Day."

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/2/1739228935257.png" alt="Google Map 5p.m. Monday February 10" />
 <figcaption>Google Map 5p.m. Monday February 10</figcaption>
 </figure>WASHINGTON —Google has officially changed the 'Gulf of Mexico' on Google Maps to the 'Gulf of America' following Trump's order.<div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">HAPPY GULF OF AMERICA DAY! 🇺🇸 <a href="https://t.co/hFGMBRKh4S">pic.twitter.com/hFGMBRKh4S</a>&mdash; The White House (@WhiteHouse) <a href="https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1888707846000570775?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div><div><blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🔊&quot;Air Force One is currently in international waters, the first time in history flying over the recently renamed Gulf of America.&quot; 🇺🇸 <a href="https://t.co/XHXXrvtYzf">pic.twitter.com/XHXXrvtYzf</a>&mdash; The White House (@WhiteHouse) <a href="https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1888705072562929894?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>While flying to the Super Bowl, President Trump signed a proclamation declaring February 9, as "Gulf of America Day."

Google officially changes maps from Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America

Lincoln - Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://youtu.be/1iZKKPoGXdk">led 23 states</a>&nbsp;in pushing back against dietary recommendations made by a committee appointed by the Biden-Harris Administration. Every five years, the federal government publishes the “Dietary Guidelines for Americans.” The Biden-Harris committee recommended that the new guidelines list beans, peas, and lentils as the best source of protein and move meat, poultry, and eggs to last on the list of recommended sources of protein.

“As common-sense Americans know, animal-based protein like beef and eggs has been and continues to be a staple in a healthy diet. The Biden-Harris Administration’s radical recommendation to get protein from beans instead of beef shows why the federal government should stay out telling Americans what to eat. We look forward to working with the Trump Administration to correct these out-of-touch ideas and to help Americans make science-based dietary choices,” said Attorney General Hilgers.

The benefits of animal-based proteins, like beef, for a healthy diet are well known. No other food has as much protein, calorie for calorie, as beef and other meats. Sufficient protein consumption is linked to satiety, proper childhood development, combating anemia, and building and maintaining muscle. Beef is also an excellent source of micronutrients, which contribute to metabolic functioning, cognitive development, and hormone regulation. In addition to pointing out the necessity of beef and other animal-based sources of protein for a balanced diet, the comment also criticizes the Biden-Harris Administration for making dietary recommendations based on “health equity” considerations.

Nebraska Cattlemen President-elect Craig Uden stated, “If the goal of the Dietary Guidelines is to make Americans healthier, we should consider not only the essential nutrients in beef, but also the opportunity beef provides to lower American’s caloric intake. It takes about twice the calories of beans, peas, and/or lentils to get the same amount of protein from beef. If we’re working together to keep America Healthy, there is no better protein source than beef.”

“The dietary guidelines have failed Americans. Since the federal government injected itself into our dietary choices fifty years ago, obesity rates have skyrocketed, and our Nation’s health has declined,” said Hilgers. “We are proud to lead our sister states in this effort to turn back the radical recommendations of the Biden-Harris Administration and reassure the public that beef and other animal-based proteins should play an important role in eating a healthy diet.”

Joining Nebraska Attorney General Hilgers on the comment are attorneys general from the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

Nebraska Attorney General OfficeLincoln - Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://youtu.be/1iZKKPoGXdk">led 23 states</a>&nbsp;in pushing back against dietary recommendations made by a committee appointed by the Biden-Harris Administration. Every five years, the federal government publishes the “Dietary Guidelines for Americans.” The Biden-Harris committee recommended that the new guidelines list beans, peas, and lentils as the best source of protein and move meat, poultry, and eggs to last on the list of recommended sources of protein.“As common-sense Americans know, animal-based protein like beef and eggs has been and continues to be a staple in a healthy diet. The Biden-Harris Administration’s radical recommendation to get protein from beans instead of beef shows why the federal government should stay out telling Americans what to eat. We look forward to working with the Trump Administration to correct these out-of-touch ideas and to help Americans make science-based dietary choices,” said Attorney General Hilgers.The benefits of animal-based proteins, like beef, for a healthy diet are well known. No other food has as much protein, calorie for calorie, as beef and other meats. Sufficient protein consumption is linked to satiety, proper childhood development, combating anemia, and building and maintaining muscle. Beef is also an excellent source of micronutrients, which contribute to metabolic functioning, cognitive development, and hormone regulation. In addition to pointing out the necessity of beef and other animal-based sources of protein for a balanced diet, the comment also criticizes the Biden-Harris Administration for making dietary recommendations based on “health equity” considerations.Nebraska Cattlemen President-elect Craig Uden stated, “If the goal of the Dietary Guidelines is to make Americans healthier, we should consider not only the essential nutrients in beef, but also the opportunity beef provides to lower American’s caloric intake. It takes about twice the calories of beans, peas, and/or lentils to get the same amount of protein from beef. If we’re working together to keep America Healthy, there is no better protein source than beef.”“The dietary guidelines have failed Americans. Since the federal government injected itself into our dietary choices fifty years ago, obesity rates have skyrocketed, and our Nation’s health has declined,” said Hilgers. “We are proud to lead our sister states in this effort to turn back the radical recommendations of the Biden-Harris Administration and reassure the public that beef and other animal-based proteins should play an important role in eating a healthy diet.”Joining Nebraska Attorney General Hilgers on the comment are attorneys general from the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

Attorney General Hilgers Leads 23 State Coalition in Criticizing Biden-Harris Dietary Recommendations   

Alliance, Neb, - On February 4th, 2025, the Alliance Police Department received a complaint regarding a male pointing a firearm at an individual. The initial investigation revealed that the victim reportedly went to a residence on the 500 block of Platte Avenue to ask about a dog that was possibly up for adoption. It was reported that the suspect engaged in a short conversation before retrieving a shotgun, loading a shell, pointing the shotgun at the victim and pulling the trigger. 

For unknown reasons, the weapon did not fire and the victim fled the scene. Officers attempted to locate the suspect but were unsuccessful. The suspect was identified as Kory A Rasmussen W/M DOB: 07/24/1988. Additional investigations were conducted, and a search warrant and arrest warrant were drafted for the individual and the residence.

On February 8th, 2025, at approximately 6:30am officers on patrol observed the suspect operating a motor vehicle northbound on Box Butte Avenue. Officers conducted a high-risk traffic stop on the vehicle in the 1200 Block of Box Butte Avenue, where the suspect was taken into custody without incident. Officers located a handgun on the suspect, as well as a long gun in the vehicle. The suspect was transported to the Box Butte County Jail.

Officers then proceeded to the suspect's residence, where the crime had occurred, and executed the search warrant. In the initial clearing of the residence, officers located drug paraphernalia in plain view. The search warrant was amended, and executed on the residence, which yielded quantifiable amounts of both methamphetamine and marijuana, evidence of drug distribution, two more long guns, and several items of drug paraphernalia. Those items were seized as evidence.

The suspect, Kory A Rasmussen, is currently being held in the Box Butte County Jail, facing charges of:

• Possession of a Firearm While Committing a Felony

• Possession of a Firearm w/ FELONY 2 Drug Violation

• Possession or Use of Drug Paraphernalia

The Alliance Police Department would like to extend its gratitude to the Nebraska State Patrol, Box Butte County Sheriff's Office, and the WING Drug Task Force for their assistance in swiftly and safely conducting these operations to ensure the safety of our community, citizens and officers

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/2/1739207445809.png" alt="(Alliance Police Department)" />
 <figcaption>(Alliance Police Department)</figcaption>
 </figure>Alliance Police DepartmentAlliance, Neb, - On February 4th, 2025, the Alliance Police Department received a complaint regarding a male pointing a firearm at an individual. The initial investigation revealed that the victim reportedly went to a residence on the 500 block of Platte Avenue to ask about a dog that was possibly up for adoption. It was reported that the suspect engaged in a short conversation before retrieving a shotgun, loading a shell, pointing the shotgun at the victim and pulling the trigger. For unknown reasons, the weapon did not fire and the victim fled the scene. Officers attempted to locate the suspect but were unsuccessful. The suspect was identified as Kory A Rasmussen W/M DOB: 07/24/1988. Additional investigations were conducted, and a search warrant and arrest warrant were drafted for the individual and the residence.On February 8th, 2025, at approximately 6:30am officers on patrol observed the suspect operating a motor vehicle northbound on Box Butte Avenue. Officers conducted a high-risk traffic stop on the vehicle in the 1200 Block of Box Butte Avenue, where the suspect was taken into custody without incident. Officers located a handgun on the suspect, as well as a long gun in the vehicle. The suspect was transported to the Box Butte County Jail.Officers then proceeded to the suspect's residence, where the crime had occurred, and executed the search warrant. In the initial clearing of the residence, officers located drug paraphernalia in plain view. The search warrant was amended, and executed on the residence, which yielded quantifiable amounts of both methamphetamine and marijuana, evidence of drug distribution, two more long guns, and several items of drug paraphernalia. Those items were seized as evidence.The suspect, Kory A Rasmussen, is currently being held in the Box Butte County Jail, facing charges of:• Use of a Firearm to Commit a Felony• Possession of a Firearm While Committing a Felony• Possession of a Firearm w/ FELONY 2 Drug Violation• Terroristic Threats• Possession of a Controlled Substance• Possession With Intent to Distribute• Possession of Marijuana 1 oz or Less• Unlawful Acts Relating to Drugs• No Drug Tax Stamp• Assault 3rd Degree (Menacing)• Disturbing the Peace• Possession or Use of Drug ParaphernaliaThe Alliance Police Department would like to extend its gratitude to the Nebraska State Patrol, Box Butte County Sheriff's Office, and the WING Drug Task Force for their assistance in swiftly and safely conducting these operations to ensure the safety of our community, citizens and officers

Alliance Police Department Executes Search Warrant Resulting in Multiple Charges

KEARNEY – The University of Nebraska at Kearney is offering a new scholarship for pre-nursing students, thanks to a generous estate gift from the late Glenn and Pearle Lahaye.

Worth $10,000 over two years, the Lahaye Nursing Scholarship was created to provide additional financial support for central and western Nebraska students pursuing this health care profession.

It’s available to incoming students who plan to study in the pre-nursing program, with preference given to those from Sheridan, Keya Paha and Cherry counties or areas along and west of Highway 281. Students must have a high school GPA of 3.0 or higher and an ACT composite score of at least 20 to qualify. And they must plan to continue their nursing studies at the University of Nebraska Medical Center’s College of Nursing.

UNK students currently completing their first year in the pre-nursing program are also eligible to apply for a $5,000 scholarship for the 2025-26 academic year.

The nursing scholarship is supported by a more than $600,000 gift from the Lahayes, along with funding from the Health Sciences Excellence Fund through the University of Nebraska Foundation.

“With the significant nursing shortage that continues in our state, we are extremely grateful for this generous donation from the Glenn and Pearle Lahaye Trust that will provide scholarships for pre-nursing students from central and western Nebraska for years to come,” said Peggy Abels, director of UNK Health Sciences. “The financial assistance provided by the Lahaye Nursing Scholarship will allow students to focus on academic success and gaining health care experience, thereby having a substantial impact on the success of these future nurses and the communities they will serve. Their generosity will have a lasting effect on the health care workforce in Nebraska.”

To apply for the Lahaye Nursing Scholarship, visit&nbsp;<a href="http://go.unk.edu/lahayescholarship">go.unk.edu/lahayescholarship</a>. The application deadline is April 1.

For more information, contact Abels at 308-865-8260 or&nbsp;<a href="mailto:abelsp@unk.edu">abelsp@unk.edu</a>.

Currently, there are 200 students enrolled in the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.unk.edu/academics/health_sciences/pre-nursing.php">pre-nursing program at UNK</a>. Over the past five years, 97% of UNK students applying to nursing school were accepted into a professional program.

Most of them choose to continue their education at UNMC, a longtime partner when it comes to training nurses to serve rural Nebraska. The institutions have been working together for more than two decades, going back to the days of Kearney State College.

More recently, they opened the $19 million Health Science Education Complex in 2015, allowing the UNMC College of Nursing to expand its undergraduate and graduate programs on the Kearney campus. The 46,000-square-foot facility also houses programs offered by the UNMC College of Allied Health Professions.

The second phase of that project – a $95 million&nbsp;<a href="https://unknews.unk.edu/2024/04/01/unk-unmc-celebrate-future-of-health-care-education-during-beam-raising-ceremony/">Rural Health Education Building</a>&nbsp;scheduled to open next year – will further address the ongoing need for nurses and other health care professionals in rural Nebraska. Located directly north of the Health Science Education Complex, the three-story, 110,000-square-foot facility allows UNMC to grow its nursing and allied health programs in Kearney while launching new programs to train physicians, pharmacists and public health professionals here.

The UNMC College of Nursing in Kearney admits nearly 90 students each year, with twice-a-year admission dates. There are UNMC nursing programs in Omaha, Lincoln, Scottsbluff and Norfolk, as well.

“The longstanding partnership between UNK and UNMC has transformed health care education in rural Nebraska, ensuring students have access to high-quality training right here in Kearney,” said interim UNK Chancellor Charlie Bicak. “The Lahaye Nursing Scholarship adds another crucial layer of support, helping pre-nursing students from central and western Nebraska pursue their passion for health care without financial barriers.”

Glenn and Pearle (Jones) Lahaye were both native Nebraskans born and raised in small, rural communities.

Originally from Burton, Pearle graduated from Keya Paha County High School in 1941 and spent most of her career working as a secretary and bookkeeper.

Glenn graduated from Rushville High School in 1939 and served as a dental technician and corporal in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War II. He was stationed in Great Bend, Kansas, when the couple married there on March 20, 1944.

Following his military service, Glenn worked as a dental laboratory technician for five years before entering the banking business in Gordon and Merriman. The couple were part of the Gordon Jubilee Committee, and Pearle was a member of the Cherry County Extension Board.

In 1978, the couple moved to Minden, where Glenn was a member of the Masonic Lodge and American Legion. He also did clock repair work in the area.

Glenn passed away in 2002 at the age of 79, and Pearle died in 2022 at the age of 97. They’re both buried in Gordon Cemetery.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/2/1739203761046.jpeg" alt=" " />
 <figcaption> </figcaption>
 </figure>Tyler EllysonUNK CommunicationsKEARNEY – The University of Nebraska at Kearney is offering a new scholarship for pre-nursing students, thanks to a generous estate gift from the late Glenn and Pearle Lahaye.Worth $10,000 over two years, the Lahaye Nursing Scholarship was created to provide additional financial support for central and western Nebraska students pursuing this health care profession.It’s available to incoming students who plan to study in the pre-nursing program, with preference given to those from Sheridan, Keya Paha and Cherry counties or areas along and west of Highway 281. Students must have a high school GPA of 3.0 or higher and an ACT composite score of at least 20 to qualify. And they must plan to continue their nursing studies at the University of Nebraska Medical Center’s College of Nursing.UNK students currently completing their first year in the pre-nursing program are also eligible to apply for a $5,000 scholarship for the 2025-26 academic year.The nursing scholarship is supported by a more than $600,000 gift from the Lahayes, along with funding from the Health Sciences Excellence Fund through the University of Nebraska Foundation.“With the significant nursing shortage that continues in our state, we are extremely grateful for this generous donation from the Glenn and Pearle Lahaye Trust that will provide scholarships for pre-nursing students from central and western Nebraska for years to come,” said Peggy Abels, director of UNK Health Sciences. “The financial assistance provided by the Lahaye Nursing Scholarship will allow students to focus on academic success and gaining health care experience, thereby having a substantial impact on the success of these future nurses and the communities they will serve. Their generosity will have a lasting effect on the health care workforce in Nebraska.”To apply for the Lahaye Nursing Scholarship, visit&nbsp;<a href="http://go.unk.edu/lahayescholarship">go.unk.edu/lahayescholarship</a>. The application deadline is April 1.For more information, contact Abels at 308-865-8260 or&nbsp;<a href="mailto:abelsp@unk.edu">abelsp@unk.edu</a>.<h2>UNMC PARTNERSHIP</h2>Currently, there are 200 students enrolled in the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.unk.edu/academics/health_sciences/pre-nursing.php">pre-nursing program at UNK</a>. Over the past five years, 97% of UNK students applying to nursing school were accepted into a professional program.Most of them choose to continue their education at UNMC, a longtime partner when it comes to training nurses to serve rural Nebraska. The institutions have been working together for more than two decades, going back to the days of Kearney State College.More recently, they opened the $19 million Health Science Education Complex in 2015, allowing the UNMC College of Nursing to expand its undergraduate and graduate programs on the Kearney campus. The 46,000-square-foot facility also houses programs offered by the UNMC College of Allied Health Professions.The second phase of that project – a $95 million&nbsp;<a href="https://unknews.unk.edu/2024/04/01/unk-unmc-celebrate-future-of-health-care-education-during-beam-raising-ceremony/">Rural Health Education Building</a>&nbsp;scheduled to open next year – will further address the ongoing need for nurses and other health care professionals in rural Nebraska. Located directly north of the Health Science Education Complex, the three-story, 110,000-square-foot facility allows UNMC to grow its nursing and allied health programs in Kearney while launching new programs to train physicians, pharmacists and public health professionals here.The UNMC College of Nursing in Kearney admits nearly 90 students each year, with twice-a-year admission dates. There are UNMC nursing programs in Omaha, Lincoln, Scottsbluff and Norfolk, as well.“The longstanding partnership between UNK and UNMC has transformed health care education in rural Nebraska, ensuring students have access to high-quality training right here in Kearney,” said interim UNK Chancellor Charlie Bicak. “The Lahaye Nursing Scholarship adds another crucial layer of support, helping pre-nursing students from central and western Nebraska pursue their passion for health care without financial barriers.”<h2>ABOUT THE DONORS</h2>Glenn and Pearle (Jones) Lahaye were both native Nebraskans born and raised in small, rural communities.Originally from Burton, Pearle graduated from Keya Paha County High School in 1941 and spent most of her career working as a secretary and bookkeeper.Glenn graduated from Rushville High School in 1939 and served as a dental technician and corporal in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War II. He was stationed in Great Bend, Kansas, when the couple married there on March 20, 1944.Following his military service, Glenn worked as a dental laboratory technician for five years before entering the banking business in Gordon and Merriman. The couple were part of the Gordon Jubilee Committee, and Pearle was a member of the Cherry County Extension Board.In 1978, the couple moved to Minden, where Glenn was a member of the Masonic Lodge and American Legion. He also did clock repair work in the area.Glenn passed away in 2002 at the age of 79, and Pearle died in 2022 at the age of 97. They’re both buried in Gordon Cemetery.

UNK launches $10,000 scholarship for future nurses

LINCOLN – For the third time in as many years, supporters of Nebraska public schools are coming together to remind state legislators that voters have already settled the issue and said NO to using public funds to pay for private schools.&nbsp;

LB509, a repeat of a 2023 voucher scheme that would hand out lavish income tax credits to benefit private schools, is in front of state senators this session and many taxpayers are frustrated that time is being taken up by an issue that only months ago was rejected by a large majority of Nebraska voters.&nbsp;

“Nebraskans have strongly rejected using public funds to pay for private schools,” said Tim Royers, president of the Nebraska State Education Association. “It’s time for our state leaders to listen to the voters and to focus on important issues – including efforts to address the teacher shortage in our state.”&nbsp;

Over the past two years, more than 200,000 Nebraskans signed petitions to repeal legislation using public funds for private schools. In 2023, the referendum petition to repeal LB753’s private school voucher scheme far exceeded the number of signatures needed to place the issue on the ballot. In a widely criticized move, the sponsor of LB753 bill then introduced LB1402 to take away Nebraskans’ right to vote on LB753. Both bills would have imposed a costly new private school voucher scheme on Nebraska taxpayers.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Royers said that some of those pushing voucher scheme bills have also “sought to demean hundreds of citizen volunteers and the intelligence of more than 200,000 petition signers by fabricating tales accusing Nebraska voters of ignorance, of not comprehending what they signed, and worse, of falsely accusing hundreds of educated volunteers of lying to gain signatures.”&nbsp;

One of those volunteers, Jean McGuire, Lincoln, confirmed that petition signers knew what they were signing and what they wanted.&nbsp;

“Over the past two years, I stood outside our public libraries to collect petition signatures to put the repeal of both LB753 and 1402 on the ballot,” said McGuire. “Voters sought out those of us collecting signatures and asked to sign the petition. We didn’t go to them – they came to us. The claims from voucher supporters that Nebraska voters did not know or understand what the petition was about is not true. Nebraskans knew what they were doing and the message they wanted to send to legislators was and remains clear: Do not divert public funds to pay for private schools.”&nbsp;

Dr. Rebecca Firestone, executive director of OpenSky Policy Institute, said the bill also presents budget concerns.&nbsp;&nbsp;

"The Nebraska Legislature is currently undertaking the unenviable task of constructing a budget with a projected $432 million deficit for the biennium,” Firestone said. “With so many important programs and budget line items to consider, there is no fiscal space for a $25 million expense for private school scholarships that could accelerate to $100 million over time. The budget should reflect the will and values of Nebraskans. LB 509 proposes new government spending with no measures of accountability, and it does not respect the will of the voters."&nbsp;

Polls by the Holland Children’s Movement show Nebraskans are opposed to giving public dollars to private schools. Indeed, Nebraska voters have rejected public funds for private schools at the ballot box on four separate occasions since 1966.&nbsp;&nbsp;

“Public opinion research results of the Holland Children’s Institute continually demonstrate major opposition to utilizing taxpayer dollars to subsidize private schools (most recently 67% “opposed”) and these policies were rejected by voters (57%) on the November ballot,” said Hadley Richters of the Holland Children’s Movement. “The Legislature should spend less time attempting to ignore the will of the people and more time encouraging the highest-quality public school systems for the future of Nebraska’s children.”&nbsp;

"Nebraska voters made clear less than 100 days ago how they felt about public dollars being used to fund private schools. <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CHGd686K_gjFc8jgY4FrW5Fc1TYo_7ZH/view?emci=683d9f1e-e2e3-ef11-90cb-0022482a94f4&amp;emdi=bcabfd4d-f1e3-ef11-90cb-0022482a94f4&amp;ceid=14445458" target="_blank">LB 509</a> is yet another attempt to institute a voucher scheme and disregard the will of Nebraska voters,” said Dr. Ferial Pearson, Board President of Stand For Schools, a nonprofit dedicated to advancing public education in Nebraska. “Looking across the country, we know these programs have proven to be expensive, unaccountable, and ineffective at delivering improved academic outcomes. We will continue to fight for the public schools that serve 9 out of 10 Nebraska students."&nbsp;&nbsp;

A near carbon-copy of LB 753 from 2023, LB509 would give a dollar-for-dollar tax credit to individuals and businesses that contribute money to private school tuition for some students – up to half that person or corporation's income tax liability, a more lucrative incentive than the state offers for any other type of charitable giving, including churches, food banks, and cancer research.&nbsp;

For more information, contact <a href="mailto:Karen.Kilgarin@nsea.org" target="_blank">Karen.Kilgarin@nsea.org</a> 402-432-7776 or <a href="mailto:Cassie.Ivy@nsea.org" target="_blank">Cassie.Ivy@nsea.org</a> 402-762-5402&nbsp;

Support Our Schools Press ReleaseLINCOLN – For the third time in as many years, supporters of Nebraska public schools are coming together to remind state legislators that voters have already settled the issue and said NO to using public funds to pay for private schools.&nbsp;LB509, a repeat of a 2023 voucher scheme that would hand out lavish income tax credits to benefit private schools, is in front of state senators this session and many taxpayers are frustrated that time is being taken up by an issue that only months ago was rejected by a large majority of Nebraska voters.&nbsp;“Nebraskans have strongly rejected using public funds to pay for private schools,” said Tim Royers, president of the Nebraska State Education Association. “It’s time for our state leaders to listen to the voters and to focus on important issues – including efforts to address the teacher shortage in our state.”&nbsp;Over the past two years, more than 200,000 Nebraskans signed petitions to repeal legislation using public funds for private schools. In 2023, the referendum petition to repeal LB753’s private school voucher scheme far exceeded the number of signatures needed to place the issue on the ballot. In a widely criticized move, the sponsor of LB753 bill then introduced LB1402 to take away Nebraskans’ right to vote on LB753. Both bills would have imposed a costly new private school voucher scheme on Nebraska taxpayers.&nbsp;&nbsp;Royers said that some of those pushing voucher scheme bills have also “sought to demean hundreds of citizen volunteers and the intelligence of more than 200,000 petition signers by fabricating tales accusing Nebraska voters of ignorance, of not comprehending what they signed, and worse, of falsely accusing hundreds of educated volunteers of lying to gain signatures.”&nbsp;One of those volunteers, Jean McGuire, Lincoln, confirmed that petition signers knew what they were signing and what they wanted.&nbsp;“Over the past two years, I stood outside our public libraries to collect petition signatures to put the repeal of both LB753 and 1402 on the ballot,” said McGuire. “Voters sought out those of us collecting signatures and asked to sign the petition. We didn’t go to them – they came to us. The claims from voucher supporters that Nebraska voters did not know or understand what the petition was about is not true. Nebraskans knew what they were doing and the message they wanted to send to legislators was and remains clear: Do not divert public funds to pay for private schools.”&nbsp;Dr. Rebecca Firestone, executive director of OpenSky Policy Institute, said the bill also presents budget concerns.&nbsp;&nbsp;"The Nebraska Legislature is currently undertaking the unenviable task of constructing a budget with a projected $432 million deficit for the biennium,” Firestone said. “With so many important programs and budget line items to consider, there is no fiscal space for a $25 million expense for private school scholarships that could accelerate to $100 million over time. The budget should reflect the will and values of Nebraskans. LB 509 proposes new government spending with no measures of accountability, and it does not respect the will of the voters."&nbsp;Polls by the Holland Children’s Movement show Nebraskans are opposed to giving public dollars to private schools. Indeed, Nebraska voters have rejected public funds for private schools at the ballot box on four separate occasions since 1966.&nbsp;&nbsp;“Public opinion research results of the Holland Children’s Institute continually demonstrate major opposition to utilizing taxpayer dollars to subsidize private schools (most recently 67% “opposed”) and these policies were rejected by voters (57%) on the November ballot,” said Hadley Richters of the Holland Children’s Movement. “The Legislature should spend less time attempting to ignore the will of the people and more time encouraging the highest-quality public school systems for the future of Nebraska’s children.”&nbsp;"Nebraska voters made clear less than 100 days ago how they felt about public dollars being used to fund private schools. <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CHGd686K_gjFc8jgY4FrW5Fc1TYo_7ZH/view?emci=683d9f1e-e2e3-ef11-90cb-0022482a94f4&amp;emdi=bcabfd4d-f1e3-ef11-90cb-0022482a94f4&amp;ceid=14445458" target="_blank">LB 509</a> is yet another attempt to institute a voucher scheme and disregard the will of Nebraska voters,” said Dr. Ferial Pearson, Board President of Stand For Schools, a nonprofit dedicated to advancing public education in Nebraska. “Looking across the country, we know these programs have proven to be expensive, unaccountable, and ineffective at delivering improved academic outcomes. We will continue to fight for the public schools that serve 9 out of 10 Nebraska students."&nbsp;&nbsp;A near carbon-copy of LB 753 from 2023, LB509 would give a dollar-for-dollar tax credit to individuals and businesses that contribute money to private school tuition for some students – up to half that person or corporation's income tax liability, a more lucrative incentive than the state offers for any other type of charitable giving, including churches, food banks, and cancer research.&nbsp;For more information, contact <a href="mailto:Karen.Kilgarin@nsea.org" target="_blank">Karen.Kilgarin@nsea.org</a> 402-432-7776 or <a href="mailto:Cassie.Ivy@nsea.org" target="_blank">Cassie.Ivy@nsea.org</a> 402-762-5402&nbsp;

Lawmakers Must Respect Voters and Reject Latest Voucher Scheme Bills 

United States Attorney Susan Lehr announced that William Stewart, age 29, of Brooklyn, New York, was sentenced on February 6, 2025, in federal court in Lincoln, Nebraska, for possession of stolen mail and possession of Post Office master keys. United States District Judge Susan M. Bazis sentenced Stewart to 40 months’ imprisonment. There is no parole in the federal system. After Stewart’s release from prison, he will begin a three-year term of supervised release.&nbsp;

On April 13, 2024, around midnight, a York County Deputy Sheriff pulled over Stewart who was driving a rental car eastbound on Interstate 80.&nbsp; The deputy smelled marijuana and searched the car, locating some marijuana paraphernalia. In the trunk, deputies found a suitcase containing a United States Postal Service envelope containing personal checks with different amounts issued by various persons and businesses. Stewart was not the payee on any of the checks. The suitcase also contained a laptop computer, a printer, and numerous blank checks. Deputies found a FedEx uniform and two United States Postal Service master or arrow keys, that are used to open Post Office collection and delivery mailboxes, in Stewart’s coat pocket. Stewart admitted the items in the car belonged to him.

In total, deputies seized 392 personal checks, 1,310 blank checks, and 42 blank check backs. Of the 392 checks located in Stewart's vehicle, there were 294 different people or businesses who had written checks. The victims’ checks were dated between December 2023 and April 2024, ranged in value from $1 up to $31,000, and totaled $222,439.95. Of the 392 checks, there were victims located in North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, New York, and Florida. Several victims incurred loss from stop or late payment fees, replacing checks, reestablishing bank accounts, and from resending checks that never made it to their destination. Stewart was ordered to pay $325.40 in restitution to cover these losses.

Deputies called two different victims from North Carolina whose checks were found. Both reported that they had issued the checks to pay bills and had placed them in mailboxes where they lived in North Carolina. Neither victim knew Stewart, nor had they given him permission to have the checks.

This case was investigated by the United States Postal Inspection Service and the York County Sheriff’s Office.&nbsp;

United States Attorney's OfficeUnited States Attorney Susan Lehr announced that William Stewart, age 29, of Brooklyn, New York, was sentenced on February 6, 2025, in federal court in Lincoln, Nebraska, for possession of stolen mail and possession of Post Office master keys. United States District Judge Susan M. Bazis sentenced Stewart to 40 months’ imprisonment. There is no parole in the federal system. After Stewart’s release from prison, he will begin a three-year term of supervised release.&nbsp;On April 13, 2024, around midnight, a York County Deputy Sheriff pulled over Stewart who was driving a rental car eastbound on Interstate 80.&nbsp; The deputy smelled marijuana and searched the car, locating some marijuana paraphernalia. In the trunk, deputies found a suitcase containing a United States Postal Service envelope containing personal checks with different amounts issued by various persons and businesses. Stewart was not the payee on any of the checks. The suitcase also contained a laptop computer, a printer, and numerous blank checks. Deputies found a FedEx uniform and two United States Postal Service master or arrow keys, that are used to open Post Office collection and delivery mailboxes, in Stewart’s coat pocket. Stewart admitted the items in the car belonged to him.In total, deputies seized 392 personal checks, 1,310 blank checks, and 42 blank check backs. Of the 392 checks located in Stewart's vehicle, there were 294 different people or businesses who had written checks. The victims’ checks were dated between December 2023 and April 2024, ranged in value from $1 up to $31,000, and totaled $222,439.95. Of the 392 checks, there were victims located in North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, New York, and Florida. Several victims incurred loss from stop or late payment fees, replacing checks, reestablishing bank accounts, and from resending checks that never made it to their destination. Stewart was ordered to pay $325.40 in restitution to cover these losses.Deputies called two different victims from North Carolina whose checks were found. Both reported that they had issued the checks to pay bills and had placed them in mailboxes where they lived in North Carolina. Neither victim knew Stewart, nor had they given him permission to have the checks.This case was investigated by the United States Postal Inspection Service and the York County Sheriff’s Office.&nbsp;

New York Man Sentenced for Possession of Stolen Mail and Postal Keys   

BY:&nbsp;<a href="https://kansasreflector.com/author/shauneen-miranda/">SHAUNEEN MIRANDA</a>&nbsp;

WASHINGTON — The largely partisan clash over whether to abolish the<a href="https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/demonstrators-us-capitol-rally-against-trumps-direct-attack-education" target="_blank">&nbsp;U.S. Department of Education</a>&nbsp;came to the forefront at a Wednesday hearing by a U.S. House education panel, as rumors continue to circulate over President Donald Trump’s plans to dismantle the federal agency that’s just four-and-a-half decades old.

Trump campaigned heavily on a pledge to get rid of the department, which, among many responsibilities, administers funding for key programs, including for low-income school districts and special education, and also administers federal student aid.

Trump is reported&nbsp;to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/02/03/trump-education-department-dismantling-executive-order-draft/?utm_campaign=wp_the7&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F40e0f46%2F67a1feefb7704a156351bc82%2F64c1c5704dae0764a1593f12%2F32%2F103%2F67a1feefb7704a156351bc82" target="_blank">possibly issue some sort of executive order</a>&nbsp;that seeks to diminish the department internally and&nbsp;<a href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-education-department-executive-order-8519eaa465385cc13f4ddcae90228dd3" target="_blank">calls on Congress to abolish the agency</a>. He alone does not have the authority to close the department, and the effort would require congressional approval.

BY:&nbsp;<a href="https://kansasreflector.com/author/shauneen-miranda/">SHAUNEEN MIRANDA</a>&nbsp;WASHINGTON — The largely partisan clash over whether to abolish the<a href="https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/demonstrators-us-capitol-rally-against-trumps-direct-attack-education" target="_blank">&nbsp;U.S. Department of Education</a>&nbsp;came to the forefront at a Wednesday hearing by a U.S. House education panel, as rumors continue to circulate over President Donald Trump’s plans to dismantle the federal agency that’s just four-and-a-half decades old.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2025/2/1739206873043.png" alt="" />
 <figcaption></figcaption>
 </figure>Trump campaigned heavily on a pledge to get rid of the department, which, among many responsibilities, administers funding for key programs, including for low-income school districts and special education, and also administers federal student aid.Trump is reported&nbsp;to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2025/02/03/trump-education-department-dismantling-executive-order-draft/?utm_campaign=wp_the7&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F40e0f46%2F67a1feefb7704a156351bc82%2F64c1c5704dae0764a1593f12%2F32%2F103%2F67a1feefb7704a156351bc82" target="_blank">possibly issue some sort of executive order</a>&nbsp;that seeks to diminish the department internally and&nbsp;<a href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-education-department-executive-order-8519eaa465385cc13f4ddcae90228dd3" target="_blank">calls on Congress to abolish the agency</a>. He alone does not have the authority to close the department, and the effort would require congressional approval.Lawmakers clashed at a House Committee on Education and Workforce hearing focused on “the state of American education,” particularly school choice, parental rights in education and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.The president’s sweeping plan outlined throughout his campaign to “save American education” has already burst out of the floodgates since he took office last month.He issued a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/trump-orders-education-department-guide-states-use-federal-funds-school-choice" target="_blank">series of education-related executive orders</a>&nbsp;last week focused on prioritizing school choice funding, ending what the administration sees as “radical indoctrination in K-12 schooling” and taking “additional measures to combat anti-semitism.”Trump also&nbsp;<a href="https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/trump-puts-dei-staff-paid-leave-guts-environmental-justice-offices-across-government" target="_blank">signed executive orders</a>&nbsp;in January that gut DEI programs and activities across the federal government.<h2>Restoring ‘common sense’</h2>Rep. Tim Walberg, chair of the House education panel, said he is “pleased to see that the Trump administration is taking excellent steps to restore common sense, personal responsibility and parental choice through our education system.”“In K-12 education, there’s much work that needs to be done,” the Michigan Republican said, pointing to the latest data from the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/" target="_blank">National Assessment of Educational Progress</a>.The report found that&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/mathematics/2024/g4_8/supporting-files/summary-of-results.pdf" target="_blank">average math and reading scores in 2024</a>&nbsp;for pupils in fourth grade and eighth grade were lower compared to before the coronavirus pandemic, in 2019.Nicole Neily, president and founder of Parents Defending Education, a parents’ rights group, said “American education is in crisis.”“For far too long, U.S. schools have focused on everything but educating children, and as last week’s NAEP scores have shown, our children are bearing the brunt of these bad decisions,” she said.<h2>‘We will fight any attempt’</h2>Meanwhile, Democrats on the panel warned over the repercussions of dismantling the Education Department.“The irony is not lost on me that we’re here to discuss the state of American education while the current administration is actively discussing how to dismantle the main federal agency responsible for ensuring safe, quality education for all students,” said Rep. Bobby Scott, ranking member of the panel.“We will fight any attempt to dismantle the department, and so, we don’t know what the plan will be, but count on our opposition to any plan that will abolish the Department of Education and the programs in it,” the Virginia Democrat added.Connecticut Democratic Rep. Jahana Hayes noted that since being created in 1979, the Education Department “has been committed to ensuring high-quality education for children across the country.”“As (Chairman Walberg) noted, there are about 1 million children who participate in private school choice programs, but 49.6 million children participate in public school education — what about them? Who is advocating for them?” Hayes said.Janai Nelson, president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, said Trump’s executive orders to “restrict teaching and learning in inclusive and supportive environments and his threats to dismantle the Department of Education and upend critical enforcement of federal civil rights laws will demolish the very foundation of good citizenship.”“We must reject these proposals out of the Project 2025 playbook and approach public education with common sense and common purpose, not separatism and self-dealing,” Nelson said.